A meta post on the four-tool Claude dev-tool suite — why the SDK breaking was the constraint that made the work possible, one tool per insight, BYOK + browser-only.
---
title: What I learned shipping four open-source Claude dev-tools in two weekends
published: true
canonical_url: https://ferhatatagun.com/blog/four-tools-in-two-weekends
description: A meta post on the four-tool Claude dev-tool suite — why the SDK breaking was the constraint that made the work possible, one tool per insight, BYOK + browser-only.
tags: claude, anthropic, opensource, webdev
cover_image:
---
About a month ago I tried to import the Anthropic SDK into a Next.js project and the bundler crashed. The fix was straightforward — talk to the Messages API directly, ~150 lines of TypeScript replacing the SDK — but the side-effect was that I now had a hand-rolled SSE client lying around, with all of Claude's streaming behaviour visible to me at the protocol level for the first time.
That client became the seed of four small open-source tools, shipped over two weekends. Each one points a different microscope at the same protocol:
All four run only in your browser, BYOK, no backend, MIT-licensed. Together they're around 400 KB gzipped; the shared SSE client is the same file in all four repos. Five long-form posts on [ferhatatagun.com/blog](https://ferhatatagun.com/blog) and Medium document the engineering decisions behind each one.
The work is done — the more interesting question for me now is what shipping them in this shape, on this timeline, taught me about building developer tools in the AI-tooling era.
**TL;DR**
If the Anthropic SDK had imported cleanly into my
// artículos relacionados
Twitter/X: 🚀 While you’re sleeping, the market is printing. I’m a futures trader, sharing my personal high…
Twitter/X: anthropic is literally crushing the new model benchmark https://t.co/Mhyy2SZtUQ
Twitter/X: EU regulator evaluating implications of Anthropic Mythos curbs after US directive https://t.co/FE…